Actually this is not quite true as evidenced by the actual report from the Guttenmacher Institute. Guttennacher released a report in April 2011, on findings of a survey regarding use of contraception among women of Christian religions, including Catholics. If you pay attention to the debate over President Obama's ruling on religious organizations providing contraceptive care to employees, you would have heard that 98% of catholic women use contraception other than natural family planning.
This blog post refutes that report and provides insight into just how Guttenmacher came to their conclusion.
Here is a brief summary of how Guttenmaher set up the survey to scew the data.
1) They didn’t count anyone that wasn’t a Catholic woman between the ages of 15-44. Obviously, that eliminates everyone that might be too old or too young to be having sex. But, it also eliminates tens of millions of people who are not too old to be having sex.
2) They didn’t count anyone who was pregnant. Obviously, the vast majority of these people were not using contraception.
3) They didn’t count anyone who just gave birth. Obviously, the vast majority of these people were not using contraception.
4) They didn’t count anyone who hadn’t had sex in the last three months. No, this doesn’t just eliminate ugly people. It eliminates every non-married person who is listening to the Catholic church enough to not have sex outside of marriage. In other words, the most likely group to be listening to the Catholic church about contraception.
5) They didn’t count anyone who was trying to get pregnant, or was indifferent to becoming pregnant. In other words, they eliminated the single most likely group to avoid contraception.
6) They didn’t count anyone who was having sex, trying to avoid pregnancy, but also not using a specific contraception method. I guess this would be the good ol’ “pull-n-pray”—which, incidentally–isn’t as religious as it sounds.
7) Two out of every five women in the survey were so incredibly Catholic that they either attended church services “less than once a month” or “never.” Never?
To summarize:
The study asked a bunch of Catholic women who are both 1) regularly having sex and 2) trying not to get pregnant, whether they’re using contraception. How did you not get 100% on that question? I mean—what are your other options in that situation? Specifically searching out people who are medically sterile? Buying the Cialis mailing list and trying to find guys with ED? Punching dudes in the groin before you hook up?
Comments on various topics not limited to politics, education, economics or sports. The photo is Mt. McKinley - Denali
Friday, February 17, 2012
Thursday, February 16, 2012
A failure of imagination put Metro on wrong track - HUMAN EVENTS
A failure of imagination put Metro on wrong track - HUMAN EVENTS
Cincinnati's street car planners should read this article and hoepfully make chanes to existing plans. I doubt they have considered the points Mr. Barone raised.
Cincinnati's street car planners should read this article and hoepfully make chanes to existing plans. I doubt they have considered the points Mr. Barone raised.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Monday, January 23, 2012
Far too long - HUMAN EVENTS
Far too long - HUMAN EVENTS
April 29, 2009 was the date the last budget was passed by Congress. From April 2009 until January 2011 the Democrats had control of both houses and the presidency, and still no budget was passed. Yet we've heard time and again from our president about the do nothing congress, and the republicans being the party of no.
In February 2011 the newly elected republican majority in the house passed a budget. It was promptly rejected by the senate. President Obama submitted a budget also, which was voted on by the senate and was rejected 97-0.
So why does no one point out the do nothing democrat senate?
April 29, 2009 was the date the last budget was passed by Congress. From April 2009 until January 2011 the Democrats had control of both houses and the presidency, and still no budget was passed. Yet we've heard time and again from our president about the do nothing congress, and the republicans being the party of no.
In February 2011 the newly elected republican majority in the house passed a budget. It was promptly rejected by the senate. President Obama submitted a budget also, which was voted on by the senate and was rejected 97-0.
So why does no one point out the do nothing democrat senate?
George Will: Making states cry uncle
George Will: Making states cry uncle
Mr. Will lays out the case for why Obamacare should be declared unconstitutional.
Mr. Will lays out the case for why Obamacare should be declared unconstitutional.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Congress in Stalemate Over Payroll Tax Cut, Unemployment Checks - HUMAN EVENTS
Congress in Stalemate Over Payroll Tax Cut, Unemployment Checks - HUMAN EVENTS
I really cannot imagine the logic that gets you to a position that republicans are the bad guys in this scenario. The republican majority House of Representatives voted to pass a 12 month extension, and the democrat lead Sentate voted on 2 months worth of the same. The Senate then adjourned for the holidays until January 23.
Members of a professional association that process payroll for employers nationwide have argued the 2 month version present many problems for companies that process their own payroll. The formula for deductions would change after February, which will mean payroll clerks will need to the change their systems, possibly delaying payrol checks to employees. There would also be a significant investment of time and money for those payroll processing companies for making system changes and testing them for accuracy.
President Obama called on the republicans to agree to the shorter term bill passed in the Senate, and then blamed them yet again for not cooperating in the legislative process. Is there a logical bone in Barack's body?
I really cannot imagine the logic that gets you to a position that republicans are the bad guys in this scenario. The republican majority House of Representatives voted to pass a 12 month extension, and the democrat lead Sentate voted on 2 months worth of the same. The Senate then adjourned for the holidays until January 23.
Members of a professional association that process payroll for employers nationwide have argued the 2 month version present many problems for companies that process their own payroll. The formula for deductions would change after February, which will mean payroll clerks will need to the change their systems, possibly delaying payrol checks to employees. There would also be a significant investment of time and money for those payroll processing companies for making system changes and testing them for accuracy.
President Obama called on the republicans to agree to the shorter term bill passed in the Senate, and then blamed them yet again for not cooperating in the legislative process. Is there a logical bone in Barack's body?
Monday, December 19, 2011
Jim and Cliff Courtney Fight Washington State
Constitutional fight over economic liberty. Interesting read on how the government interferes with free enterprise.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)