A Challenge to Our Beliefs
I Think I Can't! Who would buy a book with that title? Apparently there are many.
"What low-income whites in England and ghetto blacks in the United States
have in common is a generations-long indoctrination in victimhood"
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
The Cost of the ACA
There are many things about the Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare) that supporters of this law don't want you to understand. So I'll help you understand it.
You can force insurance companies to cover all sorts of illnesses and injuries, including those insurees are experiencing before signing up (pre-existing condition). It is a worthy cause, and a most would argue in favor of it. But it comes with a huge cost. Imagine not having insurance, having your house burn to the ground, then you go buy home owner insurance the next day, and the policy dictates the insurer must rebuild your house. That is a pre-existing condition.
Insurance is a bet that something terrible will or will not occur. You think it will occur, and the insurance policy pays off when it does.
Mandating all sorts of minimum or mandatory coverage could also be worthy, but not without costs.
Adding 30 million uninsured people to the rolls also adds costs for insurance companies. Since many of them don't have it because they cannot afford it, someone must pay for the coverage they get.
All this adds huge costs to the insurance companies. Someone must pay. And what happens if you don't pay? Never fear, subsidies from the government will pay the insurance companies for this also. Guess where the government gets that money?
The ACA was never a sound policy and certainly is not a sound law. We'll all find how just how so in due time.
You can force insurance companies to cover all sorts of illnesses and injuries, including those insurees are experiencing before signing up (pre-existing condition). It is a worthy cause, and a most would argue in favor of it. But it comes with a huge cost. Imagine not having insurance, having your house burn to the ground, then you go buy home owner insurance the next day, and the policy dictates the insurer must rebuild your house. That is a pre-existing condition.
Insurance is a bet that something terrible will or will not occur. You think it will occur, and the insurance policy pays off when it does.
Mandating all sorts of minimum or mandatory coverage could also be worthy, but not without costs.
Adding 30 million uninsured people to the rolls also adds costs for insurance companies. Since many of them don't have it because they cannot afford it, someone must pay for the coverage they get.
All this adds huge costs to the insurance companies. Someone must pay. And what happens if you don't pay? Never fear, subsidies from the government will pay the insurance companies for this also. Guess where the government gets that money?
The ACA was never a sound policy and certainly is not a sound law. We'll all find how just how so in due time.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
When Rich Get Richer, So Do the Poor
1993-2000 The Top 1% income rose 98.7%, and the bottom 99% rose 20.3%
2000-2002 The Top 1% dropped -30.8%, the Bottom 99% dropped -6.5%
2002-2007 The Top 1% rose 61.8%, and the Bottom 99% rose 6.8%
2007-2009 The Top 1% dropped -36.3%, and the Bottom 99% dropped -11.6%
2009-2012 The Top 1% rose 31.4%, and the bottom 99% rose 0.4%
See a trend yet? When the rich get richer, so do the poor. When rich get poorer, so do the poor.
Source Data (Thomas Piketty of the Paris School of Economics and Emmanuel Saez of the University of California, Berkeley)
Another piece of information from this report is this. When the rich get richer, the poverty rate declines. When the rich get poorer, the poverty rate increases.
2000-2002 The Top 1% dropped -30.8%, the Bottom 99% dropped -6.5%
2002-2007 The Top 1% rose 61.8%, and the Bottom 99% rose 6.8%
2007-2009 The Top 1% dropped -36.3%, and the Bottom 99% dropped -11.6%
2009-2012 The Top 1% rose 31.4%, and the bottom 99% rose 0.4%
See a trend yet? When the rich get richer, so do the poor. When rich get poorer, so do the poor.
Source Data (Thomas Piketty of the Paris School of Economics and Emmanuel Saez of the University of California, Berkeley)
Another piece of information from this report is this. When the rich get richer, the poverty rate declines. When the rich get poorer, the poverty rate increases.
The A.C.O.R.N. Doesn't Fall Far From The Tree
Truth About Navigators
Project Veritas, the same people that exposed A.C.O.R.N. are now exposing fraud and lying by the Healthcare.gov navigators.
Project Veritas, the same people that exposed A.C.O.R.N. are now exposing fraud and lying by the Healthcare.gov navigators.
Friday, November 8, 2013
Settled Law Needs Fixed?
Last night the President told Chuck Todd he was sorry we listened to him when he lied about keeping your insurance plan or your doctor. During that interview he also said he told his team to find ways to close the holes and fix this law.
Funny! I thought it was a good law, and now we're told it needs fixing. Actually, various democrats have been saying both for years. They tell us it is settled law you recall. Then in their next breath they suggest it needs to be fixed.
Those same people also tell us if we opposed this settled law in need of fixing we must be racist. I'm not really sure about the logic of democrats.
To summarize, the law is good, and settled. But we should work with them to fix it. Meanwhile, people are losing their insurance and their doctors, even though President Obama said they would not. He did not lie, even though he knew otherwise.
Funny! I thought it was a good law, and now we're told it needs fixing. Actually, various democrats have been saying both for years. They tell us it is settled law you recall. Then in their next breath they suggest it needs to be fixed.
Those same people also tell us if we opposed this settled law in need of fixing we must be racist. I'm not really sure about the logic of democrats.
To summarize, the law is good, and settled. But we should work with them to fix it. Meanwhile, people are losing their insurance and their doctors, even though President Obama said they would not. He did not lie, even though he knew otherwise.
Thursday, November 7, 2013
More Thoughts on Obamacare
Following such doomed programs as "Cash for Clunkers", and environmental projects such as "Solyndra", what makes anyone think the federal government is capable of managing a program that constitutes 18% of the US economy - healthcare?
Cash for Clunkers did not have the economic impact dreamed of. Rather it made a few buyers purchase a new car a few months sooner than they otherwise would have.
Solyndra cost tax payers $550 million in loan guarantees to a company managed by Obama campaign donors, that quickly went bankrupt while those investors sold off their stock and got very wealthy.
And now, we are told that a few glitches (Geez, I hate that term.) are preventing a $635 Million website from saving us all a lot of money for health insurance. When actually, adding more people, more benefits, and fewer policy options, will lead to reduced availability, more unaffordable healthcare options.
Senator Enzi, (R-WY) spoke on the floor of the US Senate in September 2010 about he consequences which we are currently experiencing. He seems to forecast the pain we're feeling now with incredible accuracy. (Click here for details)
Cash for Clunkers did not have the economic impact dreamed of. Rather it made a few buyers purchase a new car a few months sooner than they otherwise would have.
Solyndra cost tax payers $550 million in loan guarantees to a company managed by Obama campaign donors, that quickly went bankrupt while those investors sold off their stock and got very wealthy.
And now, we are told that a few glitches (Geez, I hate that term.) are preventing a $635 Million website from saving us all a lot of money for health insurance. When actually, adding more people, more benefits, and fewer policy options, will lead to reduced availability, more unaffordable healthcare options.
Senator Enzi, (R-WY) spoke on the floor of the US Senate in September 2010 about he consequences which we are currently experiencing. He seems to forecast the pain we're feeling now with incredible accuracy. (Click here for details)
Is It "Settled Law" or Not?
Unions May Get Obamacare Tax Relief
Democrats have recently taken up the mantra that Obamacare is settled law, and therefore cannot be touched. Well, does that mean unions get an exemption or not? The settled legislation does not currently allow for union exemptions. Nor does it allow for congressional subsidies. And yet, Democrats are quite okay with the president changing the "settled law", but not allowing republicans to even bring up the subject of modifying or defunding the law.
There are already more than a thousand exceptions and exemptions from portions of this law. I'm not quite sure what is so settled.
Democrats have recently taken up the mantra that Obamacare is settled law, and therefore cannot be touched. Well, does that mean unions get an exemption or not? The settled legislation does not currently allow for union exemptions. Nor does it allow for congressional subsidies. And yet, Democrats are quite okay with the president changing the "settled law", but not allowing republicans to even bring up the subject of modifying or defunding the law.
There are already more than a thousand exceptions and exemptions from portions of this law. I'm not quite sure what is so settled.
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Thoughts on the Affordable Care Act, Obamacare
Way back before this became law, I told anyone who would listen the impending law would be bad law. Here is why I thought so then, and still do.
- The federal government is not efficient when it comes to managing programs. There are many which are wasteful, fraud filled, and just plain inefficient. Count the number of presidential candidates who claim they would stop the waste, fraud and abuse in various programs.
- This law was written by whom? Do you know? Much of it was written by lobbyists, and the rest by legislators, political aides, and occasionally and actual elected official.
- The law was negotiated and tailored by democrats only, in the proverbial smoke-filled room. Votes were bought using the politically expedient bribery known as the Cornhusker Kickback, and the Louisiana Purchase.
- No republican official was permitted into that room. Instead, republicans were discounted as having no good ideas worth considering. They were excluded completely from the process.
- A bill containing approximately 2400 written pages was formed in the middle of night, under cloak of darkness, then brought to the floor of the US Senate for a vote without those voting ever having an opportunity to read it first. It passed along party lines. Only democrats voting for it, and no republicans voting for it.
- As this is a tax, so determined by the US Supreme Court, it needed to originate in the House of Representatives, according to the US Constitution, but was not.
- The democrat majority in the House also passed it along party lines. Some democrats, facing conservative pressure in their district, we permitted by party leaders to vote against, only because they had the required number of votes already lined up.
- During the debate on healthcare reform, President Obama gave nearly 50 speeches on the need for this law. We now know he lied repeatedly about the effects of this law on individual policy holders.
- This law cannot do what it is claimed will be the beneficial results. Adding millions of people, increasing minimum coverage, mandating coverage for pre-existing conditions, and lifting lifetime limits all only raise the costs of insurance. There is no way this can possibly lower costs.
Friday, October 11, 2013
NBC/WSJ poll: 60 percent say fire every member of Congress
NBC/WSJ poll: 60 percent say fire every member of Congress
I agree with the sentiment here. Career politicians are becoming the problem, and are not part of the solution to what is wrong with our country. We should term limit elected officials who are not doing the job the voters sent them to office to do.
I am considering voting against any incumbent in office more than 2 terms, unless that person is doing exactly the job I think he or she should be doing.
When our country was founded, elected officials took their jobs seriously. And by jobs, I mean their unelected career, as shopkeepers, farmers, or other. We should have part time politicians who return to their career after only a few years of service.
Turn them over. Vote none of the above.
I agree with the sentiment here. Career politicians are becoming the problem, and are not part of the solution to what is wrong with our country. We should term limit elected officials who are not doing the job the voters sent them to office to do.
I am considering voting against any incumbent in office more than 2 terms, unless that person is doing exactly the job I think he or she should be doing.
When our country was founded, elected officials took their jobs seriously. And by jobs, I mean their unelected career, as shopkeepers, farmers, or other. We should have part time politicians who return to their career after only a few years of service.
Turn them over. Vote none of the above.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Are Guns the Problem? Walter Williams
Are Guns the Problem?
Here's the money quote from this column:
Customs, traditions, moral values and rules of etiquette, not just laws and government regulations, are what make for a civilized society, not restraints on inanimate objects. These behavioral norms -- transmitted by example, word of mouth and religious teachings -- represent a body of wisdom distilled through ages of experience, trial and error, and looking at what works.
Here's the money quote from this column:
Customs, traditions, moral values and rules of etiquette, not just laws and government regulations, are what make for a civilized society, not restraints on inanimate objects. These behavioral norms -- transmitted by example, word of mouth and religious teachings -- represent a body of wisdom distilled through ages of experience, trial and error, and looking at what works.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Ann Coulter - September 18, 2013 - CRAZIER THAN LIBERALS
Ann Coulter - September 18, 2013 - CRAZIER THAN LIBERALS
Ann makes a great case in this column. Guns are not the problem.
Ann makes a great case in this column. Guns are not the problem.
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Thomas Sowell, PhD - Minimum Wage Madness
Minimum Wage Madness - Part I
Minimum Wage Madness - Part II
So how many people really think it is wise to pay inexperienced, unskilled workers more than their productivity is worth?
If you got 2 bids for the cost of a project around your house, how many would simply pay the highest bidder, for no other reason than because the contractor needs to make more money?
Minimum Wage Madness - Part II
So how many people really think it is wise to pay inexperienced, unskilled workers more than their productivity is worth?
If you got 2 bids for the cost of a project around your house, how many would simply pay the highest bidder, for no other reason than because the contractor needs to make more money?
Gun Control - Let the debate begin anew
Funny how every time there is a shooting in the news, liberals and many others seek out the cameras and microphones to declare anew a need for gun control. Keep in mind that yesterday's shooter was stopped from killing even more people by men with guns.
Interesting notes about recent mass shootings:
The Aurora Colorado theater shooter passed up 2 movie theaters that did NOT have no guns allowed signs, to get to the theater with the no guns allowed sign.
The Connecticut school shooter picked a school to shoot up, and schools do not allow guns on premises.
The Ft. Hood shooter shot up a military base, and the Navy Yard shooter shot up another military installation. The US Military does not permit soldiers and sailors to carry firearms on bases.
Why is it that mass shooters pick place to shoot and kill that are unlikely to have any victims who might shoot back at them?
Interesting notes about recent mass shootings:
The Aurora Colorado theater shooter passed up 2 movie theaters that did NOT have no guns allowed signs, to get to the theater with the no guns allowed sign.
The Connecticut school shooter picked a school to shoot up, and schools do not allow guns on premises.
The Ft. Hood shooter shot up a military base, and the Navy Yard shooter shot up another military installation. The US Military does not permit soldiers and sailors to carry firearms on bases.
Why is it that mass shooters pick place to shoot and kill that are unlikely to have any victims who might shoot back at them?
Friday, September 13, 2013
Cal Thomas: We've been played
Cal Thomas: We've been played
The money quote from this article:
In his nationally televised address Tuesday night, President Obama said little that was not already known. By my count he used the words "I," "me" and "my" 30 times in his 15-minute address. He personalizes everything, but delivers little, except uncertainty in his foreign policy. The world is becoming increasingly dangerous because we have a president who either does not know how to lead, or doesn't want to lead in foreign affairs.
The money quote from this article:
In his nationally televised address Tuesday night, President Obama said little that was not already known. By my count he used the words "I," "me" and "my" 30 times in his 15-minute address. He personalizes everything, but delivers little, except uncertainty in his foreign policy. The world is becoming increasingly dangerous because we have a president who either does not know how to lead, or doesn't want to lead in foreign affairs.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Obama's Syria Problem
August has been a very busy month for me personally and professionally. I wanted to write a few more blog entries but simply did not have time.
President Obama is drumming for war in Syria. Of course he won't use the term 'war'. But his plans for military action in response to the use of chemical weapons is problematic at best, and dangerous at worst. :Let's consider the following:
1. Claiming to want to hamper Al Asaad's chemical weapons capability, Obama claims there will be no boots on the ground. This is a reference to no need for an invasion force such as in Iraq. However, the advance notice he gave to Al Asaad have provided the Syrians ample time to relocate the stockpile, move human shields into harm's way, and take other evasive measures.
2. Secretary of State John Kerry has informed the Syrians it would be a "very small" military action. Whoa now. That has some scary consequences implied, no?
3. Members of both the administration and the Pentagon have leaked specific target details. When was the last time a military was successful in telling the enemy which targets they were working against?
4. Politically speaking, this action is problematic for Obama at home. The citizens are not interested in another military action. They've seen long, protracted military actions which end up being very costly, both in human terms and and financial.
5. After having his Secretary of State called a liar by Russian President Putin, Obama goes to Russia for already planned meetings, and poses for photos with Putin, shaking his hand and smiling. There's supporting the chain of command for you.
President Obama is drumming for war in Syria. Of course he won't use the term 'war'. But his plans for military action in response to the use of chemical weapons is problematic at best, and dangerous at worst. :Let's consider the following:
1. Claiming to want to hamper Al Asaad's chemical weapons capability, Obama claims there will be no boots on the ground. This is a reference to no need for an invasion force such as in Iraq. However, the advance notice he gave to Al Asaad have provided the Syrians ample time to relocate the stockpile, move human shields into harm's way, and take other evasive measures.
2. Secretary of State John Kerry has informed the Syrians it would be a "very small" military action. Whoa now. That has some scary consequences implied, no?
3. Members of both the administration and the Pentagon have leaked specific target details. When was the last time a military was successful in telling the enemy which targets they were working against?
4. Politically speaking, this action is problematic for Obama at home. The citizens are not interested in another military action. They've seen long, protracted military actions which end up being very costly, both in human terms and and financial.
5. After having his Secretary of State called a liar by Russian President Putin, Obama goes to Russia for already planned meetings, and poses for photos with Putin, shaking his hand and smiling. There's supporting the chain of command for you.
Thursday, August 1, 2013
Hey Mayor Mallory, Watch and Learn
Detroit's Death by Democracy
This column should titled "Detroit's Death by Democrats". Or perhaps "Detroit's Death by Unions".
George hits the nail on the head here, and the proof is in other municipalities and states being run, or run into the ground, by democrats and unions. Mayor Mark Mallory of Cincinnati should pay attention, as he might learn something.
Cincinnati's mayor and a majority of council are building a $140+ million dollar street car that has less than 2 miles of track. The end points of that track are a stadium and a marketplace. Just how many people will drive downtown, park their cars, get on the street car to go to either location, then get back on the trolley to their cars, and drive home? None I say, but maybe you get lucky with a few.
The proponents admit the fares will not cover the operating costs and intend to take tax revenues form the local casino to pay for the street car. The problem is they have already planned to spend that money on other projects, violating the economic law that says you cannot spend the same dollar twice, much less more times.
Meanwhile the city has failed to fully fund the city employee unions pension funds as required by law. That fund is approximately 50% funded as of the last report published.
Will democrats and their union allies ever understand what they are doing? Rank and file union members should stand up and be heard.
This column should titled "Detroit's Death by Democrats". Or perhaps "Detroit's Death by Unions".
George hits the nail on the head here, and the proof is in other municipalities and states being run, or run into the ground, by democrats and unions. Mayor Mark Mallory of Cincinnati should pay attention, as he might learn something.
Cincinnati's mayor and a majority of council are building a $140+ million dollar street car that has less than 2 miles of track. The end points of that track are a stadium and a marketplace. Just how many people will drive downtown, park their cars, get on the street car to go to either location, then get back on the trolley to their cars, and drive home? None I say, but maybe you get lucky with a few.
The proponents admit the fares will not cover the operating costs and intend to take tax revenues form the local casino to pay for the street car. The problem is they have already planned to spend that money on other projects, violating the economic law that says you cannot spend the same dollar twice, much less more times.
Meanwhile the city has failed to fully fund the city employee unions pension funds as required by law. That fund is approximately 50% funded as of the last report published.
Will democrats and their union allies ever understand what they are doing? Rank and file union members should stand up and be heard.
Monday, July 8, 2013
Never Mind
A Never Mind Presidency - George Will
Does anyone find it at least a little bit troubling that this president can simply say never mind with regards to various laws. The PPACA (Obamacare) mandates employers with more than 50 employees must provide health care coverage to those employees by October 2013 for the 2014 calendar year. Now President Obama has delayed a legally passed and signed law for 12 more year, to 2015, conveniently after mid term elections.
The president has done similar legal evasions by choosing not to enforce other laws, such a various immigration laws, creating his own non- congressional "dream act". This was a proposed, but never passed, piece of legislation that would have legalized countless children of illegal immigrants who had no choice in coming to America with their parents.
He also had his AG Eric Holder dismiss charges for which member of the Black Panthers intimidated voters in a polling place in Philadelphia. I guess voter intimidation is okay when blacks impose on non-blacks, but not the other way around.
Let's also not forget that Obama chose not to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), and has often times proposed executive orders which have the effect of laws, especially regarding the EPA and Department of Labor.
This country has many founding principles including that we all follow the rule of law. Laws are passed by legislative bodies and signed into law by executives who enforce the laws. Courts determine whether laws are being followed or broken, and in some cases whehter said lass violate state or federal constitutions. Presidents do not get to make law and choose whether or not to enforce this or the other law.
George Will nailed it on this one.
Does anyone find it at least a little bit troubling that this president can simply say never mind with regards to various laws. The PPACA (Obamacare) mandates employers with more than 50 employees must provide health care coverage to those employees by October 2013 for the 2014 calendar year. Now President Obama has delayed a legally passed and signed law for 12 more year, to 2015, conveniently after mid term elections.
The president has done similar legal evasions by choosing not to enforce other laws, such a various immigration laws, creating his own non- congressional "dream act". This was a proposed, but never passed, piece of legislation that would have legalized countless children of illegal immigrants who had no choice in coming to America with their parents.
He also had his AG Eric Holder dismiss charges for which member of the Black Panthers intimidated voters in a polling place in Philadelphia. I guess voter intimidation is okay when blacks impose on non-blacks, but not the other way around.
Let's also not forget that Obama chose not to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), and has often times proposed executive orders which have the effect of laws, especially regarding the EPA and Department of Labor.
This country has many founding principles including that we all follow the rule of law. Laws are passed by legislative bodies and signed into law by executives who enforce the laws. Courts determine whether laws are being followed or broken, and in some cases whehter said lass violate state or federal constitutions. Presidents do not get to make law and choose whether or not to enforce this or the other law.
George Will nailed it on this one.
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Latest “Deal” from the Senate: Pass Amnesty First, Read the Bill Later | RedState
Latest “Deal” from the Senate: Pass Amnesty First, Read the Bill Later | RedState
This latest installment of "pass it to know it" legislation deals with immigration reforms. Pretty serious stuff, no? Like Obamacare(Affordable Care Act), the legislators we all elected will vote on whether to pass the bill without reading or understanding it.
In todays' Congress, laws are written by who know who, possibly by staffers, but more likely by lobbyists. Hundreds or thousands of pages of legalese which would take weeks to read and understand, if even possible. And our elected representatives are expected to read a summary, provided by some who supposedly knows, and vote to pass or not.
You may or may not like the current bill being pushed through the halls. You may or may not like the next one. Are you willing to trust anyone with bills that will have far reaching impact on the lives of our citizens? Would you like the bill behind Door #1, Door #2 or Door #3? Would you let someone else pick the door on your behalf?
That is what's happening in Washington DC in recent years. What are you going to do about it?
This latest installment of "pass it to know it" legislation deals with immigration reforms. Pretty serious stuff, no? Like Obamacare(Affordable Care Act), the legislators we all elected will vote on whether to pass the bill without reading or understanding it.
In todays' Congress, laws are written by who know who, possibly by staffers, but more likely by lobbyists. Hundreds or thousands of pages of legalese which would take weeks to read and understand, if even possible. And our elected representatives are expected to read a summary, provided by some who supposedly knows, and vote to pass or not.
You may or may not like the current bill being pushed through the halls. You may or may not like the next one. Are you willing to trust anyone with bills that will have far reaching impact on the lives of our citizens? Would you like the bill behind Door #1, Door #2 or Door #3? Would you let someone else pick the door on your behalf?
That is what's happening in Washington DC in recent years. What are you going to do about it?
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Affirmative Action
Justices Take Pass on Texas Affirmative-Action Case .
Affirmative Action : When legislators believe people to be incapable of deciding who to accept or hire without considering race, they pass a law forcing them to consider race.
Affirmative Action : When legislators believe people to be incapable of deciding who to accept or hire without considering race, they pass a law forcing them to consider race.
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Restoring Trust in Government
Thomas Sowell wrote this article about trust and government. Read it Here
"But we the voters are not blameless. Having chosen an untested man to be president, on the basis of rhetoric, style and symbolism, we have ourselves to blame if we now have only a choice between two potentially tragic fates -- the loss of American lives to terrorism or a further dismantling of our freedoms that has already led many people to ask: "Is this still America?""
We elected Barack Obama, who came with little to no experience in government, and even less running any kind of organization as an executive. During the campaign for the 2008 election there were no fewer than 18 books written about or by this man we elected. He then won a Nobel Peace Prize for accomplishing exactly nothing.
This man spoke of fundamentally changing America, and now we see it happening before our eyes.
His administration claims transparency, which would in theory, allow us to see everything we need to see about what and how he operates. I scoff at that claim.
His Attorney General lies about investigations.
His trophy legislation is a 2400 page bill voted on before it was read.
He chooses which laws to enforce regarding immigration and marriage.
His DOJ dropped charges of voter intimidation against those who were already convicted of it.
The NSA is spying on Americans while his appointed claim they do not.
He claims to cut a budget that is ever bigger year after year.
He has travelled more away from DC than any president in history, and that is just election campaigning, fund raising and vacationing.
Fundamentally change America. You bet he did. What do you think?
"But we the voters are not blameless. Having chosen an untested man to be president, on the basis of rhetoric, style and symbolism, we have ourselves to blame if we now have only a choice between two potentially tragic fates -- the loss of American lives to terrorism or a further dismantling of our freedoms that has already led many people to ask: "Is this still America?""
We elected Barack Obama, who came with little to no experience in government, and even less running any kind of organization as an executive. During the campaign for the 2008 election there were no fewer than 18 books written about or by this man we elected. He then won a Nobel Peace Prize for accomplishing exactly nothing.
This man spoke of fundamentally changing America, and now we see it happening before our eyes.
His administration claims transparency, which would in theory, allow us to see everything we need to see about what and how he operates. I scoff at that claim.
His Attorney General lies about investigations.
His trophy legislation is a 2400 page bill voted on before it was read.
He chooses which laws to enforce regarding immigration and marriage.
His DOJ dropped charges of voter intimidation against those who were already convicted of it.
The NSA is spying on Americans while his appointed claim they do not.
He claims to cut a budget that is ever bigger year after year.
He has travelled more away from DC than any president in history, and that is just election campaigning, fund raising and vacationing.
Fundamentally change America. You bet he did. What do you think?
Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Sex and the Military - Thomas Sowell PhD
Sex and the Military - Thomas Sowell, PhD
Two very telling quotes from this column are below.
There seems to be something liberating about ignorance and inexperience. You are free to believe whatever you want to, unencumbered by hard facts and, if you have political power, to impose your headstrong ignorance on those with first-hand knowledge.
A more insidious consequence of having ignorant civilians micro-managing the military is that the caliber of a nation's military leaders can be affected when generals have to pass through filters for political correctness to reach the top.
Two very telling quotes from this column are below.
There seems to be something liberating about ignorance and inexperience. You are free to believe whatever you want to, unencumbered by hard facts and, if you have political power, to impose your headstrong ignorance on those with first-hand knowledge.
A more insidious consequence of having ignorant civilians micro-managing the military is that the caliber of a nation's military leaders can be affected when generals have to pass through filters for political correctness to reach the top.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Marriage, Family and Income
Teaching how to sell women into slavery
This column explains how income inequality and joining a traditional family are related. Interesting and provocative article.
I can summarize this as: Get married, stay married, prosper. Stay single, have children, live in poverty.
This column explains how income inequality and joining a traditional family are related. Interesting and provocative article.
I can summarize this as: Get married, stay married, prosper. Stay single, have children, live in poverty.
Monday, May 20, 2013
White House Supports Sarah
Read the Washington Post Column here
So the person responsible for managing the group that targeted conservative groups for additional scrutiny of tax exempt status applications is promoted. Sarah Hall Ingram was promoted to the division of the IRA that will be responsible for enforcing regulations related to the Affordable Care Act ( Obamacare), even though she allow, by either omission or commission, this unfair treatment of conservative groups of tax payers.
If she did not know that her subordinates were actively doing this, she should have known. She is the responsible manager. How could someone ignorant of the actions of her employees be promoted for exemplary performance, as was described by IRS officials? If she did know they were doing these things, how could she be promoted for exemplary performance? Again, the White House wants it both ways.
Ms. Ingram should not just be removed form her current post but from the IRS in any capacity.
So the person responsible for managing the group that targeted conservative groups for additional scrutiny of tax exempt status applications is promoted. Sarah Hall Ingram was promoted to the division of the IRA that will be responsible for enforcing regulations related to the Affordable Care Act ( Obamacare), even though she allow, by either omission or commission, this unfair treatment of conservative groups of tax payers.
If she did not know that her subordinates were actively doing this, she should have known. She is the responsible manager. How could someone ignorant of the actions of her employees be promoted for exemplary performance, as was described by IRS officials? If she did know they were doing these things, how could she be promoted for exemplary performance? Again, the White House wants it both ways.
Ms. Ingram should not just be removed form her current post but from the IRS in any capacity.
Thursday, May 9, 2013
BEWARE OF LIBERALS WHO COME IN EVANGELICALS' CLOTHING
Ann Coulter - May 8, 2013 - BEWARE OF LIBERALS WHO COME IN EVANGELICALS' CLOTHING
Ms. Coulter is typically provocative here. This column deals with how some Christians rationalize illegal immigration and why we should accept these illegal immigrants into our country, in the face of comparison to other issues which face our nation. This is very interesting.
Ms. Coulter is typically provocative here. This column deals with how some Christians rationalize illegal immigration and why we should accept these illegal immigrants into our country, in the face of comparison to other issues which face our nation. This is very interesting.
Friday, April 26, 2013
Federal Budget Lies, Distortions and Mismanagement
Dems First to Blink
The sequester, we're told, is automatic budget cuts which budget managers cannot control. They are mandatory and deep and painful.
The truth is that the FAA budget, as if the congress actually passed a budget, increased 4% over last year. That is correct, you read that right. A 4% increase instead of an 8% increase, which was to be before the sequester took effect. And now we learn that the FAA cannot function on 4% more money than last year and must furlough 47,000 employees.
This is going on all over the federal agencies and departments across this land. Furloughs. Temporarily taking days off without pay for many employees to avoid not paying them, and thus saving budget dollars which were, ahem, cut.
Mathematics learned in elementary school taught us that if A > B, then A > B. This year the amount of money in your coffers to spend (A), is greater than the amount in your coffers last year (B), then you have more money, not less. Therefore, your budget was not cut.
The sequester, we're told, is automatic budget cuts which budget managers cannot control. They are mandatory and deep and painful.
The truth is that the FAA budget, as if the congress actually passed a budget, increased 4% over last year. That is correct, you read that right. A 4% increase instead of an 8% increase, which was to be before the sequester took effect. And now we learn that the FAA cannot function on 4% more money than last year and must furlough 47,000 employees.
This is going on all over the federal agencies and departments across this land. Furloughs. Temporarily taking days off without pay for many employees to avoid not paying them, and thus saving budget dollars which were, ahem, cut.
Mathematics learned in elementary school taught us that if A > B, then A > B. This year the amount of money in your coffers to spend (A), is greater than the amount in your coffers last year (B), then you have more money, not less. Therefore, your budget was not cut.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Academic Cesspools
Academic Cesspools - Walter Williams
Universities around this nation are less educational and more indoctrinating. This column by Walter Williams details some of this. There are countless examples of colleges and universities that have modified their curriculum to include fewer and fewer actual educational courses and more and more "warm and fuzzy, feel good" courses. These new courses do not help a student by teaching critical thinking skills or fact-based information. Rather they indoctrinate youth into thinking like the professors think, which is more liberal, progressive and socialist than ever before.
Universities around this nation are less educational and more indoctrinating. This column by Walter Williams details some of this. There are countless examples of colleges and universities that have modified their curriculum to include fewer and fewer actual educational courses and more and more "warm and fuzzy, feel good" courses. These new courses do not help a student by teaching critical thinking skills or fact-based information. Rather they indoctrinate youth into thinking like the professors think, which is more liberal, progressive and socialist than ever before.
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Random Political Thoughts
Gun rights are guaranteed in the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution. Those rights should not be infringed upon. We should tread lightly where the US Constitution is involved.
President Obama says elections have consequences, then gets indignant when he loses a vote in the Senate.
The media needs to shape up. Cover the story, report the facts.
When someone in the media says we should not jump to conclusions, be ready for them to do just that.
It should be a requirement that all federal laws from here on are written down in 10 pages or less. Obamacare counted over 2200 pages of legislation, and now 15,000 new pages of regulations. Bigger is not always better.
Following mass shootings in Aurora, Newtown and Phoenix we blamed guns. following the Boston Marathon bombing, we blamed the bomber. Make any sense?
Slowing the rate of spending is not the same as cutting spending. Even though we sequestered money, spending this year will still exceed last year. Spending did not get cut year over year.
Everything inside Washington DC is political. Deal with it.
President Obama says elections have consequences, then gets indignant when he loses a vote in the Senate.
The media needs to shape up. Cover the story, report the facts.
When someone in the media says we should not jump to conclusions, be ready for them to do just that.
It should be a requirement that all federal laws from here on are written down in 10 pages or less. Obamacare counted over 2200 pages of legislation, and now 15,000 new pages of regulations. Bigger is not always better.
Following mass shootings in Aurora, Newtown and Phoenix we blamed guns. following the Boston Marathon bombing, we blamed the bomber. Make any sense?
Slowing the rate of spending is not the same as cutting spending. Even though we sequestered money, spending this year will still exceed last year. Spending did not get cut year over year.
Everything inside Washington DC is political. Deal with it.
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Fact Free Crusade
Fact Free Crusade by Thomas Sowell
Many people making arguments, pro or con, on various topics, including gun control legislation, never let facts get in their way. If there were any study done which correlated fewer lives lost to few guns, don't you think they would cite such a study over and over again?
It's almost as if they expect you to believe that if you are shot with a .38 special you will not die, but if shot with an AR-15, with a magazine containing more than 7 bullets, you will surely die. And so will dozens of people around you, even if that magazine only held 8 bullets.
Many people making arguments, pro or con, on various topics, including gun control legislation, never let facts get in their way. If there were any study done which correlated fewer lives lost to few guns, don't you think they would cite such a study over and over again?
It's almost as if they expect you to believe that if you are shot with a .38 special you will not die, but if shot with an AR-15, with a magazine containing more than 7 bullets, you will surely die. And so will dozens of people around you, even if that magazine only held 8 bullets.
Monday, April 15, 2013
Boston Bombing - Obama comments
My thoughts and prayers go out too those affected by the explosions in Boston. May God heal the wounds and give strength to all those taking care of the injured and working to solve the investigation
President Obama stated that we should not jump to conclusion ( ... The police acted stupidly ) and we will hold those accountable ( Benghazi).
President Obama stated that we should not jump to conclusion ( ... The police acted stupidly ) and we will hold those accountable ( Benghazi).
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Proportional Response
Proportional Response - Thomas Sowell
Fighting wars the way we have fought in Iraq and Afghanistan is no way ti win a war. Gone are the days of shock and awe I suppose. Allowing politicians to fight a war instead of trained military officers is a bad idea.
Proportional Reponse is a theory of retaliation with like tactics and weapons. Not bringing a knife to a fist fight, or a gun to knife fight. We should rarely if ever go to war. But when we do go to war, we should fight to win, and worry about what comes next only after the fighting ends. Defeating your enemy brings the best peace. If you don't believe me, check out countries which have been solidly defeated and forced to surrender, such as Japan, after WWII.
Fighting wars the way we have fought in Iraq and Afghanistan is no way ti win a war. Gone are the days of shock and awe I suppose. Allowing politicians to fight a war instead of trained military officers is a bad idea.
Proportional Reponse is a theory of retaliation with like tactics and weapons. Not bringing a knife to a fist fight, or a gun to knife fight. We should rarely if ever go to war. But when we do go to war, we should fight to win, and worry about what comes next only after the fighting ends. Defeating your enemy brings the best peace. If you don't believe me, check out countries which have been solidly defeated and forced to surrender, such as Japan, after WWII.
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Poverty soars to post-60s high | Human Events
Poverty soars to post-60s high | Human Events
The War on Poverty instituted by LBJ in the 1960's is an objective failure. We have spent trillions of dollars to end poverty, only to expand it. By any measure it has failed.
What he have done is encouraged the very lifestyle that is the opposite of that which leads to prosperity. By approving of illegitimate children, abortion, divorce, and unwed parenting, we have devalued the family.
By graduating from school, getting a job, marrying, and then having children, in that order, people are infinitely more likely to avoid poverty. Is that what our current set of policies and cultural acceptance have gained us?
"The only rational response to such failure is to try something completely different. Evidently we are not allowed to talk about policies that would restore the American family, the great bulwark against poverty."
The War on Poverty instituted by LBJ in the 1960's is an objective failure. We have spent trillions of dollars to end poverty, only to expand it. By any measure it has failed.
What he have done is encouraged the very lifestyle that is the opposite of that which leads to prosperity. By approving of illegitimate children, abortion, divorce, and unwed parenting, we have devalued the family.
By graduating from school, getting a job, marrying, and then having children, in that order, people are infinitely more likely to avoid poverty. Is that what our current set of policies and cultural acceptance have gained us?
"The only rational response to such failure is to try something completely different. Evidently we are not allowed to talk about policies that would restore the American family, the great bulwark against poverty."
Friday, March 29, 2013
George Will: A bipartisan abdication: Facilitating Obama's imperial presidency
George Will: A bipartisan abdication: Facilitating Obama's imperial presidency
How much of this new reality in DC is attributable to lack of proper education about government, the constitution and civics? It is becoming so that people simply do not know about, understand, or invoke the US Constitution. Mind you, that is the document which lead to the creation and development of what has become the most powerful force for good in the history of mankind.
The US has become the most powerful military force, economy, and magnet for people from around the world, that man has ever known. The Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution, are the basis for all of that.
Will, and Senator Webb, have demonstrated examples of why those documents are so important, and are being trampled.
How much of this new reality in DC is attributable to lack of proper education about government, the constitution and civics? It is becoming so that people simply do not know about, understand, or invoke the US Constitution. Mind you, that is the document which lead to the creation and development of what has become the most powerful force for good in the history of mankind.
The US has become the most powerful military force, economy, and magnet for people from around the world, that man has ever known. The Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution, are the basis for all of that.
Will, and Senator Webb, have demonstrated examples of why those documents are so important, and are being trampled.
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Truth and Consequences of Obamacare
HHS Secretary Admits to Higher Premiums
This is what happens when our legislators vote for bills they have not read. As Nancy Pelosi said, we have to pass it to know what's in it. Well, we got what they voted for, whether we wanted it or not.
This monstrosity of a bill does not come close to doing what it was sold to do. It will not lower the costs of medical treatments and services. It will not lower the cost of health insurance. And it will not be good for this country.
This bill should be repealed.
This is what happens when our legislators vote for bills they have not read. As Nancy Pelosi said, we have to pass it to know what's in it. Well, we got what they voted for, whether we wanted it or not.
This monstrosity of a bill does not come close to doing what it was sold to do. It will not lower the costs of medical treatments and services. It will not lower the cost of health insurance. And it will not be good for this country.
This bill should be repealed.
Friday, March 15, 2013
Thomas Sowell - Intellectuals and Race
Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV
This series of short columns written by Thomas Sowell explains how intellectuals approach issues around ethnic and racial differences. It provides historical context for the counter argument to inequality explained in race and ethnicity terms.
"The desire of intellectuals for some grand theory that will explain complex patterns with some solitary and simple factor has produced many ideas that do not stand up under scrutiny, but which have nevertheless had widespread acceptance -- and sometimes catastrophic consequences -- in countries around the world." Thomas Sowell
Part II
Part III
Part IV
This series of short columns written by Thomas Sowell explains how intellectuals approach issues around ethnic and racial differences. It provides historical context for the counter argument to inequality explained in race and ethnicity terms.
"The desire of intellectuals for some grand theory that will explain complex patterns with some solitary and simple factor has produced many ideas that do not stand up under scrutiny, but which have nevertheless had widespread acceptance -- and sometimes catastrophic consequences -- in countries around the world." Thomas Sowell
Monday, March 11, 2013
George Will: The Pop-Tart terrorist
George Will: The Pop-Tart terrorist
"Government is failing spectacularly at its core functions, such as budgeting and educating. Yet it continues to multiply its peripheral and esoteric responsibilities, tasks that require it to do things for which it has no aptitude, such as thinking and making common-sense judgments."
I could not agree more. Zero tolerance has come to mean zero intelligence I think.
"Government is failing spectacularly at its core functions, such as budgeting and educating. Yet it continues to multiply its peripheral and esoteric responsibilities, tasks that require it to do things for which it has no aptitude, such as thinking and making common-sense judgments."
I could not agree more. Zero tolerance has come to mean zero intelligence I think.
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Ann Coulter - February 27, 2013 - WHY DOES ANYONE NEED TO READ ABOUT CELEBRITIES?
Ann Coulter - February 27, 2013 - WHY DOES ANYONE NEED TO READ ABOUT CELEBRITIES?
The 2nd amendment to the US Constitution does not say we have the right to own revolvers, or semi-automatics handguns, or automatic weapons, tnaks, drones, or bazookas. It DOES say we a right to bear arms. It also says the federal government cannot infringe yupon that right. If they tell us we cannot own an AR-15 with a 20 round magazine, does that infringe on my right? How can it not? They would have placed a limit on the right to all but some kind of arms.
The 2nd amendment to the US Constitution does not say we have the right to own revolvers, or semi-automatics handguns, or automatic weapons, tnaks, drones, or bazookas. It DOES say we a right to bear arms. It also says the federal government cannot infringe yupon that right. If they tell us we cannot own an AR-15 with a 20 round magazine, does that infringe on my right? How can it not? They would have placed a limit on the right to all but some kind of arms.
Monday, February 25, 2013
George Will: Apocalypse fatigue
George Will: Apocalypse fatigue
During the years of the Obama administration, federal spending has increased 17%. Mind you, there has not been a budget passed since 2009. This year the 'lack of a budget' deficit will be $1.08T, or 30% of spending will be borrowed money. Meanwhile, President Obama wants you to believe that a 2.3% cut in spending, due to the sequestration, will be unbearable.
Whether it is unbearable or not, it is necessary, and it is not enough. You see, the cuts are not really cuts as the federal government will actually spend more money this year than last.
During the years of the Obama administration, federal spending has increased 17%. Mind you, there has not been a budget passed since 2009. This year the 'lack of a budget' deficit will be $1.08T, or 30% of spending will be borrowed money. Meanwhile, President Obama wants you to believe that a 2.3% cut in spending, due to the sequestration, will be unbearable.
Whether it is unbearable or not, it is necessary, and it is not enough. You see, the cuts are not really cuts as the federal government will actually spend more money this year than last.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Cultural Deviancy - Not Guns
Cultural Deviancy - Not Guns
"Today's Americans accept behavior that our parents and grandparents never would have accepted."
My father-in-law was a sheriff deputy, and always said the reason for what's wrong in America today is the break down of the family unit.
In the information technology community, all problems with hardware or software has a root cause. Finding the root cause and fixing it is how you resolve problems, and advance the technology. Putting that in terms of cultural deviancy, you must find the root cause of the deviancy and fix that. That root cause will not be the gun.
"Today's Americans accept behavior that our parents and grandparents never would have accepted."
My father-in-law was a sheriff deputy, and always said the reason for what's wrong in America today is the break down of the family unit.
In the information technology community, all problems with hardware or software has a root cause. Finding the root cause and fixing it is how you resolve problems, and advance the technology. Putting that in terms of cultural deviancy, you must find the root cause of the deviancy and fix that. That root cause will not be the gun.
Monday, February 4, 2013
Football vs Abortion
When asked about the dangers of playing football, President Barack Obama said this:
I tend to be more worried about college players than NFL players in the sense that the NFL players have a union, they're grown men, they can make some of these decisions on their own, and most of them are well-compensated for the violence they do to their bodies. You read some of these stories about college players who undergo some of these same problems with concussions and so forth and then have nothing to fall back on. That's something that I'd like to see the NCAA think about.
The implication, of course, is that college players need someone to look out for them, to help them make decisions, to play or not.
Source: http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/41223022/
In 2001 when he was an Illinois state senator, Obama declined to take a position on two pieces of legislation that would have required parental notification for minors who have an abortion, voting "present" instead of "yes" or "no." But five years earlier, he had filled out an issues questionnaire for the influential Independent Voters of Illinois Independent Precinct Organization opposing such notifications. "Do you support parent consent/notification for minors seeking abortion?" the survey asked. "No," he wrote.…
Source: http://www.citelighter.com/political-science/politics/knowledgecards/obama-abortion
So we can summarize these conflicting points of view by saying that President Obama believes young girls are equipped to decide for themselves if they need birth control, the morning after pill, or an abortion, without the advise and consent of a parent. But young men are not capable of deciding to play football or not.
I tend to be more worried about college players than NFL players in the sense that the NFL players have a union, they're grown men, they can make some of these decisions on their own, and most of them are well-compensated for the violence they do to their bodies. You read some of these stories about college players who undergo some of these same problems with concussions and so forth and then have nothing to fall back on. That's something that I'd like to see the NCAA think about.
The implication, of course, is that college players need someone to look out for them, to help them make decisions, to play or not.
Source: http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/41223022/
In 2001 when he was an Illinois state senator, Obama declined to take a position on two pieces of legislation that would have required parental notification for minors who have an abortion, voting "present" instead of "yes" or "no." But five years earlier, he had filled out an issues questionnaire for the influential Independent Voters of Illinois Independent Precinct Organization opposing such notifications. "Do you support parent consent/notification for minors seeking abortion?" the survey asked. "No," he wrote.…
Source: http://www.citelighter.com/political-science/politics/knowledgecards/obama-abortion
So we can summarize these conflicting points of view by saying that President Obama believes young girls are equipped to decide for themselves if they need birth control, the morning after pill, or an abortion, without the advise and consent of a parent. But young men are not capable of deciding to play football or not.
Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Is It Time to Outlaw Crowbars?
http://www.newschannel9.com/news/top-stories/stories/woman-arrested-accused-killing-man-crowbar-3948.shtml
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/261021/3/Crowbar-beating-in-St-Louis-caught-on-tape
http://qctimes.com/news/state-and-regional/iowa/warrant-indicates-woman-killed-with-crowbar/article_b8d5684c-6548-56ee-b2b3-409645b33cb6.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4155874&page=1
I heard a news report about a crime committed with a crowbar, and thought, based on the logic of gun control advocates, we should now ban crowbars. I did a Google search and found the above crowbar crime stories.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/261021/3/Crowbar-beating-in-St-Louis-caught-on-tape
http://qctimes.com/news/state-and-regional/iowa/warrant-indicates-woman-killed-with-crowbar/article_b8d5684c-6548-56ee-b2b3-409645b33cb6.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4155874&page=1
I heard a news report about a crime committed with a crowbar, and thought, based on the logic of gun control advocates, we should now ban crowbars. I did a Google search and found the above crowbar crime stories.
Silence is Deafening, Regarding Sen. Menendez Sex Scandal
Read Article Here
The silence is deafening. If this man were a Republican, the left would be screaming about how terrible this is, and how he should resign. But he is a democrat. You might say that is an easy and unproven theory. But when a Republican finds himself in political hot water, there is never a microphone close enough to the liberals.
The silence is deafening. If this man were a Republican, the left would be screaming about how terrible this is, and how he should resign. But he is a democrat. You might say that is an easy and unproven theory. But when a Republican finds himself in political hot water, there is never a microphone close enough to the liberals.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
How to save the children: One scholar’s study of 'killology' - conservative news
How to save the children: One scholar’s study of 'killology' - conservative news
I've seen this man interviewed on Fox News a few months ago, and I recall how impressed I was with his knowledge and insight. This column is eye opening coming from Mr. Grossman.
I've seen this man interviewed on Fox News a few months ago, and I recall how impressed I was with his knowledge and insight. This column is eye opening coming from Mr. Grossman.
George Will: Sign of overreach: A case that abuses First and Fifth Amendments
Read George Will's Column Here
They should not be able to take your property, and shut you up for complaining in the process.
They should not be able to take your property, and shut you up for complaining in the process.
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Americans Down on America
Read Article Here on Breitbart.com
The fact that 39% of Americans don't feel positive about America is alarming. This is the lowest number in this group since the Carter administration.
The question I have is why did enough people vote for Barack Obama if they have such little hope for America since he has been the president?
The fact that 39% of Americans don't feel positive about America is alarming. This is the lowest number in this group since the Carter administration.
The question I have is why did enough people vote for Barack Obama if they have such little hope for America since he has been the president?
Do Gun Control Laws Control Guns?
Read Column Here
"The gun control controversy is only the latest of many issues to be debated almost solely in terms of fixed preconceptions, with little or no examination of hard facts." Thomas Sowell, PhD
Like so many issues our government takes on, they do so out of emotion, and not out of rational consideration of facts. Other topics include taxation, health care, pollution and global warming, and many more. Too many people in today's political climate act based on an emotional response to an incident instead of using facts and experience to decide course of action.
"The gun control controversy is only the latest of many issues to be debated almost solely in terms of fixed preconceptions, with little or no examination of hard facts." Thomas Sowell, PhD
Like so many issues our government takes on, they do so out of emotion, and not out of rational consideration of facts. Other topics include taxation, health care, pollution and global warming, and many more. Too many people in today's political climate act based on an emotional response to an incident instead of using facts and experience to decide course of action.
Friday, January 18, 2013
Obama Jobs Council hits 1 year without official meeting
Obama Jobs Council hits 1 year without official meeting
Can you really call it a jobs council if there are no council meetings?
What does this lack of meetings say about President Obama's commitment to creating jobs?
Can you really call it a jobs council if there are no council meetings?
What does this lack of meetings say about President Obama's commitment to creating jobs?
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Paul to Take on Obama Over Gun Control
Read Article Here
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) believes, and so do I, that President Obama does not have the authority to take the actions he described in his press briefing on Wednesday January 16, 2013.
Specifically mentioned by Paul is a conflict between the 14th item in the list of actions Obama is planning to take, and the Obamacare legislation.
From the PPACA:
(c) PROTECTION OF SECOND AMENDMENT GUN RIGHTS.— (1) WELLNESS AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS.— A wellness and health promotion activity implemented under subsection (a)(1)(D) may not require the disclosure or collection of any information relating to—(A) the presence or storage of a lawfully- possessed firearm or ammunition in the residence or on the property of an individual; or (B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm or ammunition by an individual.
From Executive action item #14:
Protect the rights of health care providers to talk to their patients about gun safety: Doctors and other health care providers also need to be able to ask about firearms in their patients’ homes and safe storage of those firearms, especially if their patients show signs of certain mental illnesses or if they have a young child or mentally ill family member at home.
Some have incorrectly claimed that language in the Affordable Care Act prohibits doctors from asking their patients about guns and gun safety. Medical groups also continue to fight against state laws attempting to ban doctors from asking these questions.
The Administration will issue guidance clarifying that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit or otherwise regulate communication between doctors and patients, including about firearms.
Note the obvious conflict between the law and the action regarding whether doctors may ask patients about guns in the home.
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) believes, and so do I, that President Obama does not have the authority to take the actions he described in his press briefing on Wednesday January 16, 2013.
Specifically mentioned by Paul is a conflict between the 14th item in the list of actions Obama is planning to take, and the Obamacare legislation.
From the PPACA:
(c) PROTECTION OF SECOND AMENDMENT GUN RIGHTS.— (1) WELLNESS AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS.— A wellness and health promotion activity implemented under subsection (a)(1)(D) may not require the disclosure or collection of any information relating to—(A) the presence or storage of a lawfully- possessed firearm or ammunition in the residence or on the property of an individual; or (B) the lawful use, possession, or storage of a firearm or ammunition by an individual.
From Executive action item #14:
Protect the rights of health care providers to talk to their patients about gun safety: Doctors and other health care providers also need to be able to ask about firearms in their patients’ homes and safe storage of those firearms, especially if their patients show signs of certain mental illnesses or if they have a young child or mentally ill family member at home.
Some have incorrectly claimed that language in the Affordable Care Act prohibits doctors from asking their patients about guns and gun safety. Medical groups also continue to fight against state laws attempting to ban doctors from asking these questions.
The Administration will issue guidance clarifying that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit or otherwise regulate communication between doctors and patients, including about firearms.
Note the obvious conflict between the law and the action regarding whether doctors may ask patients about guns in the home.
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Are Guns the Problem?
Are Guns the Problem? (Read article here)
I have been saying to many of my friends and family that the problem today is lack of shame and personal responsibility. Walter Williams expands on that thought by saying our traditions, values and morals are not being adhered to and handed down from one generation the the next.
I have been saying to many of my friends and family that the problem today is lack of shame and personal responsibility. Walter Williams expands on that thought by saying our traditions, values and morals are not being adhered to and handed down from one generation the the next.
Monday, January 14, 2013
Bloomberg Slaps Down Criticism of Painkiller Restriction Plan
Bloomberg Slaps Down Criticism of Painkiller Restriction Plan
Didn't Obamacare supporters claim Obamacare would stop the practice of uninsured people going to emergency rooms for routine care?
Why do politicians in city hall think they can alter doctor prescription practices?
So the answer to robbery is to not allow people to possess items robbers may want to take at gunpoint?
Didn't Obamacare supporters claim Obamacare would stop the practice of uninsured people going to emergency rooms for routine care?
Why do politicians in city hall think they can alter doctor prescription practices?
So the answer to robbery is to not allow people to possess items robbers may want to take at gunpoint?
Friday, January 11, 2013
Big Government v Free Market Dilemma
Many of the left side of the political spectrum think that bigger government is not only preferred, but required, in order to keep this country moving. Some have more sinister agendas that secretly call for downgrading American exceptionalism in favor of global equality with other lesser economies in other countries.
What they fail to account for is that the free market economy which built this nation into the most powerful, wealthiest, prosperous nation in history cannot be centrally planned or executed.
Free market economy means people all over the nation, and around the globe for that matter, making decisions about what they want or need, and what they are willing to give up in order to get those things. Billions or people making thousands of decisions daily about how and where to spend money, time and effort.
Private or public school? Buy new or used car, or repair existing car? Remodel the house, or move to new house? Drive or take a bus, train or plane? Grocery store or dine out? Dinner and movie or DVD and microwave popcorn? Hire employee or save money until regulations are settled? Stay and pay, or move and pay less, in taxes I mean?
In recent times our President Obama has excused his inability to properly plan for the economy due to the following events or circumstances: tsunami, ATMs, kiosks in airports, hurricanes, two wars, past administrations, obstructionist politicians, European economic issues, and more. If he cannot control for these events, inventions, and circumstances, how can a central planner possibly account for billions of free wills making self interested decisions?
The answer is, of course, you cannot. The self interest of all parties involved in the marketplace is a powerful force which can be regulated, but not planned for and controlled.
The federal government tries to regulate this economic activity, but that regulatory goal has been bastardized into controlling. Agencies like the EPA, FCC and others have sought to control activity through regulation, which has the effect of law. Navigating this regulatory maze is now the business of many lawyers and consultants, and an extremely high cost to employers primarily, and also to consumers.
If government would reduce regulations to a lesser, manageable degree, and let economic activity take place with less interference, the economy would begin growing at levels we have not seen in almost a decade. As economic activity increases, the revenue from taxation also increases, without a need to raise tax rates.
Get out of the way and let it work. We will all reap the benefits.
What they fail to account for is that the free market economy which built this nation into the most powerful, wealthiest, prosperous nation in history cannot be centrally planned or executed.
Free market economy means people all over the nation, and around the globe for that matter, making decisions about what they want or need, and what they are willing to give up in order to get those things. Billions or people making thousands of decisions daily about how and where to spend money, time and effort.
Private or public school? Buy new or used car, or repair existing car? Remodel the house, or move to new house? Drive or take a bus, train or plane? Grocery store or dine out? Dinner and movie or DVD and microwave popcorn? Hire employee or save money until regulations are settled? Stay and pay, or move and pay less, in taxes I mean?
In recent times our President Obama has excused his inability to properly plan for the economy due to the following events or circumstances: tsunami, ATMs, kiosks in airports, hurricanes, two wars, past administrations, obstructionist politicians, European economic issues, and more. If he cannot control for these events, inventions, and circumstances, how can a central planner possibly account for billions of free wills making self interested decisions?
The answer is, of course, you cannot. The self interest of all parties involved in the marketplace is a powerful force which can be regulated, but not planned for and controlled.
The federal government tries to regulate this economic activity, but that regulatory goal has been bastardized into controlling. Agencies like the EPA, FCC and others have sought to control activity through regulation, which has the effect of law. Navigating this regulatory maze is now the business of many lawyers and consultants, and an extremely high cost to employers primarily, and also to consumers.
If government would reduce regulations to a lesser, manageable degree, and let economic activity take place with less interference, the economy would begin growing at levels we have not seen in almost a decade. As economic activity increases, the revenue from taxation also increases, without a need to raise tax rates.
Get out of the way and let it work. We will all reap the benefits.
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
2nd Amendment
As ratified: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Note it does not say for the purpose of hunting deer, but for the purpose of securing a free state.
Note it does not say for the purpose of hunting deer, but for the purpose of securing a free state.
Planned Parenthood's New Annual Report: We Did 333,964 Abortions; 1 Every 94 Seconds | CNS News
Planned Parenthood's New Annual Report: We Did 333,964 Abortions; 1 Every 94 Seconds | CNS News
They call themselves Planned Parenthood, and their tools of trade is a procedure which prevents parenthood.
They call themselves Planned Parenthood, and their tools of trade is a procedure which prevents parenthood.
Educators
Dishonest Educators
The Role of 'Educators'
Two of my favorite columnists wrote today about educators. The public schools of this era are failing our students and our society. These two men write about exactly how they are failing us.
The Role of 'Educators'
Two of my favorite columnists wrote today about educators. The public schools of this era are failing our students and our society. These two men write about exactly how they are failing us.
Monday, January 7, 2013
The Giant Gaping Hole in Sandy Hook Reporting
The Giant Gaping Hole in Sandy Hook Reporting
Politicians are now making news for their efforts to control guns. Many of them fail to see the problem, and are trying to solve the problem violating the US Constitution.
This article details many examples of killers using guns, but also using, or not using, medications for psychiatric problems. The media is not reporting on this in the Newtown shootings.
Politicians are now making news for their efforts to control guns. Many of them fail to see the problem, and are trying to solve the problem violating the US Constitution.
This article details many examples of killers using guns, but also using, or not using, medications for psychiatric problems. The media is not reporting on this in the Newtown shootings.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)